The Birth and Evolution of a Villain, Cultural Marxism, the Death Cult- Part 2

Intersectional Politics (IP), Critical Race Theory (CRT), and ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI),’ are derivatives of what is called ‘Cultural Marxism.’ Cultural Marxism, when viewed through the lens of history, does nothing but visit division, degradation, destruction, and death upon all those who practice it, as well as those it is practiced against. 

In the Soviet Republic religion was, at a minimum, heavily frowned upon (Nikolova & Djankov, 2018). The USSR tried to phase religion out, and being an openly religious person more often than not would land you in hot water. The reason is that in Marxist doctrine the State is the Supreme Authority. Marx believed that religion formed an authority that would be used against the people by the elite, enslaving them. His end goal for Communism was the abolishment of all authority, which is why Marxists are usually involved with, or regarded as, anarchists (like Anti-fa, the anarcho-communists). There are different brands of Communism, like Stalinism and Leninism, which are somewhat pro-State, but they are deviations from what Marx intended. Marx was anti-authoritarian and believed that people should rule themselves, each individually, and then collectively. This would happen organically. 

The State, in Communism, only facilitates the spread of Communism, which is why crimes were/are usually codified as ‘anti-revolutionary,’ in Communist nations. Once Communism is global, in theory, society would stabilize, and the State would no longer be needed. The State then dissolves, and everyone lives in harmony. In theory, obviously. Religion, though, is something that would impede the progress of Communism and divide people (Nikolova & Djankov, 2018). Also, Marx believed that religion was a system of power that would be used by Priests, the elite of any religion, to subjugate the people once again. So, in Marxist countries, doctrines, and movements, religion is bad.

This is where Modern Scientific Materialism (SM) is born, a.k.a. atheism, secular humanism, etc. According to these paradigms, a human is nothing but a meat robot, full of impulses guided by neurochemistry and sensory input. A fetus is nothing more than a clump of cells. Sex is just an activity. No one thing has any meaning (a form of Nihilism) beyond that which we can objectively measure.  

Objectivity is a crucial part of Marxism, sort of. Marxism cannot divide people based on any sort of intersectionality once it has been fully implemented, as then there would be another victim/oppressor dichotomy in the ‘perfect society.’ IP is only used during the revolutionary part of Communism, pre-utopia. Post-revolution, science must be fair to everyone, and cannot cause division, it cannot differentiate, because that would undo the idea behind Communism; everyone is equal and the same. And so, a pseudo-science (Science™!) is born. Science™! controls the narrative. “Follow the Science™!” is the Ave Maria of Cultural Marxism.

Remember how the definition of ‘vaccine’ was changed during COVID-19, after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was released (Kochi, 2021)? You better not; that is just a conspiracy theory (Najera, 2021). Besides, it’s totally normal to change definitions (Tulp, 2022), and anyway, they did it to be more transparent (Loe, 2022). See? This is how Science™! controls the narrative. This is called gaslighting (Psychology Today, 2017), and it is a form of manipulation. 

So we have Science™!, Nihilism, and Anarchy. Science defines what is, it defines the world. Anything that cannot be proven probably doesn’t exist. Consciousness cannot be proven, so it probably doesn’t exist. Some scientists think that consciousness is just an amalgamation of sensory input that is a few seconds behind what is actually occurring (Neuroscience News, 2022). You’re not conscious, you just think you are. Nihilism says that nothing has any meaning and anarchy says that there should not be any rulers or rules. No rules, nothing matters, and we’re not even real. It’s not about collectivism. It’s not about creating a better world; it is about division, degradation, destruction, and death. 

Division, degradation, destruction, and death. That seems like an order of operations, no? Divide a population (CRT/DEI), degrade them and what they know to be real and true (Science™!) until it is destroyed. Once your enemy and their will and ability to fight is destroyed, all that is left is to deliver them unto death.

We’ve seen how CRT/DEI divides people, and how Science™! is destroying knowledge and our ability to think, our ideas of what and who we are as people. What is Cultural Marxism doing to degrade us? What else is being destroyed? 

The “Sexual Revolution” (SR) and the “Women’s Liberation” movements of the 1960s evolved simultaneously, and it could probably be said that they are the same movement, and will be referred to as such herein (SR). The goal of the SR movement was to free women from the oppressive Patriarchy; vile men who all sleep with their secretaries and do nothing but hold women down by keeping them barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen. Women wanted to be educated, a part of the workforce, and powerful. They wanted to be taken seriously. 

After the initiation of the SR, marked by bra burnings and other petulant forms of protest, things went rapidly downhill for women. They didn’t want to be sex objects, but the porn industry and sexualized ad industry boomed. They wanted to work, and because of that wages were ostensibly halved to make up for a doubling of the workforce. Divorce freed women from abusive men, yes, but due to the halved wages, most women couldn’t make it, as they usually were given custody of the children, and so women became impoverished and had to turn to the Government for hand-outs, probably inducing a sense of shame. They wanted to be educated, and colleges began to acquiesce, but women rarely go into STEM fields where the real money is, due to neurological and personality differences between men and women (Rogan & Peterson, 2018, 2:33, 10:46). I assume this led to women taking on Student Loan debt that wouldn’t be able to be paid off at nearly the rate that men pay it off, due to wages earned post education, exacerbating their poverty.

The SR divided men and women, and degraded women specifically, especially the female identity. But what other effects did the SR have? What else happened there? Well, because it was a sexual revolution, sexuality came to the forefront. Homosexuality started to become mainstream. While not accepted everywhere, it became a common subject. As it entered the fray, homosexual men began to be caricaturized; deviant, sensual, promiscuous. That promiscuity led to the spread of diseases within the homosexual community. Like them or not, they’re human, and they were subject to the degradation that women were subjected to, in the same time frame. 

Science™! and the media did a lot with the LGBTQ movement, specifically with gay men recently. Remember Money Pox? We had just crested over COVID, and the media was talking about the next big disease: Monkey Pox. Only, it was found to be mostly transmitted via gay men and anal sex (Seang et al., 2022). Then cases in dogs and kids began to be reported (Seang et al., 2022 & Mitropoulos, 2022), and the story was dropped. Why? Because the LGBTQ movement typically is sympathetic to the Left and Culturally Marxist ideologies. They couldn’t criticize their own or they would lose votes. 

Over time the homosexual movement was co-opted by the Trans Movement, a thing that is still ongoing. This movement is degrading our children, sexualizing them at an early age because Science™! says it’s normal. Convincing a 5-year-old of almost anything is pretty easy, they look to us for guidance and truth. Convincing them that they are the opposite gender and sending them home to parents with something as serious as a ‘gender identity crisis’ will sow division; division between parents and children, parents and schools, and division between members of society that support said practice, and those that dissent. This destroys a society’s ability to function.